The Evidence Centre on behalf of the Health Foundation
Improvement science. Research Scan (2011)
Improvement science is about finding out how to improve
and make changes in the most effective way. It is about
systematically examining the methods and factors that best
work to facilitate quality improvement.
Dorim sa includem aici carti, articole stiintifice, rapoarte, lucrari de licenta,
masterat si doctorat, pagini web elaborate in domeniul stiintei imbunatatirii
sistemului de sanatate. Invitam autorii care au astfel de contributii sa ne
trimita informatiile necesare identificarii lucrarilor.
Cheryl Ulmer, Michelle Bruno, and Sheila Burke, Editors
Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality
and Disparities Reports (2010)
The National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports play
a fundamental role in examining quality improvement and
Simply Ask! A Guide to Religious Sensitivity for Healthcare
This booklet aims to sensitize and equip healthcare practitioners
with knowledge about the religious and spiritual needs of their
clients from the major religions.
Linda Kohn, Janet Corrigan, and Molla Donaldson, Editors
To Err Is Human. Building a Safer Health System (2000)
The title of this report encapsulates its purpose. Human beings,
in all lines of work, make errors. Errors can be prevented by
designing systems that make it hard for people to do the wrong
thing and easy for people to do the right thing.
The Evidence Centre on behalf of the Health Foundation
Quality Improvement Training for Healthcare Professionals
There is an increasing focus on improving healthcare in order to
ensure higher quality, greater access and better value for money.
Eugen T‚rcoveanu, Mihai Roca, Traian Mihaescu
Scrierea si publicarea unei prezentari de caz clinic
In aceasta lucrare prezentam un
case report check sheet
care poate fi folosit ca instrument de autoevaluare, inainte
de a trimite o prezentare de caz clinic spre publicare.
Adriana Condorateanu, Andrei Cernomaz,
Cum se scrie si se publica un caz clinic
Erin P. Balogh, Bryan T. Miller, and John R. Ball, Editors
Improving Diagnosis in Health Care (2015)
This report has three major themes.
First, Improving Diagnosis in Health Care exposes a critical type
of error in health care - diagnostic error - that has received
relatively little attention since the release of
To Err Is Human
Second, patients are central to the solution. ... The reportís first
goal centers on the need to establish partnerships with patients
and their families to improve diagnosis, and several recommen-
dations aim to facilitate and enhance such partnerships.
Third, diagnosis is a collaborative effort. ... The complexity of
health and disease and the increasing complexity of health care
demands collaboration and teamwork among and between health
care professionals, as well as with patients and their families.
Martin Makary, Michael Daniel
Medical error - the third leading cause of death in the US
Death certificates in the US, used to compile national statistics,
have no facility for acknowledging medical error. If medical error
was a disease, it would rank as the third leading cause of death
in the US. The system for measuring national vital statistics should
be revised to facilitate better understanding of deaths due to
Richard Scoville, Kevin Little, Jeff Rakover, Katharine Luther,
Kedar Mate (IHI White Paper)
Sustaining Improvement (2016)
How can health care organizations sustain improvements in safety,
effectiveness, and efficiency of patient care? According to the new
IHI White Paper, Sustaining Improvement, the key is to focus on the
daily work of frontline managers, supported by a high-performance
management system that prescribes standard tasks and responsi-
bilities for managers at all levels of the organization.
The white paper presents a theoretical context for high-performance
management, grounded in the Juran Trilogy (Quality Planning,
Quality Control, and Quality Improvement); a framework for high-
performance management; a driver diagram for implementing the
framework; and case examples describing three organizations
approaches to testing and implementing management standard
Mihai Roca, Traian Mihaescu
Implementarea unei strategii nationale pentru BPOC
Dezvoltarea si implementarea unei strategii nationale pentru
BPOC va asigura limitarea actiunii factorilor de risc, diagnos-
ticarea precoce a cazurilor, managementul bolnavilor intr-un
sistem medical integrat in care se aplica principiile medicinei
bazate pe dovezi, care aloca in mod dinamic resurse si servicii
medicale in functie de severitatea patologiei, cu optimizarea
costurilor si a indicatorilor de morbiditate.
Diagnostice gresite aparute in buletinele statistice de deces
din anii '940
National Quality Forum
Improving Diagnostic Quality and Safety (2017)
The Committee designed a measurement framework that can be
used to improve quality and safety in the diagnostic process.
The final measurement framework takes into account the patient,
the patientís family, caregivers, and their experiences with the
diagnostic process. The framework considers the diagnostic
process itself, including the initial steps in identifying the patientís
health problem, the timeliness of the diagnosis, communication of
diagnosis, and whether appropriate follow-up services were
provided. Finally, the framework addresses organizational issues,
including efforts to learn from diagnostic errors, patientsí access to
diagnostic services in a timely manner, availability of appropriate
staff and material resources, as well as the organizationís culture
as it pertains to diagnostic quality and safety.
Health Service Executive. Quality Improvement Division
Improvement Knowledge and Skills Guide.
Development Assessment Tool for All Staff (2017)
Improvement is everyoneís role and responsibility and this is clear
from the improvement initiatives already being undertaken by
frontline staff and teams in our health service. We must find new
and better ways of working together within hospital groups,
community healthcare organisations and the national ambulance
service to deliver high quality care and services to patients,
service users and their families. This is essential in fulfilling our
commitment to achieving real and sustained improvements.
The aim of this guide is to support the ongoing learning and
professional development of all staff both clinical and non-clinical
by providing a list of improvement knowledge and skills which
can help to educate, train and guide staff on how to deliver
improvement in the health service.
Cum se scrie un articol in engleza?
Procesul de scriere a unui articol nu este unul unic. Nu exista o
reteta perfecta. Fiecare isi dezvolta pana la urma un anumit
mecanism cu care se simte confortabil si care ii este de folos.
Scrierea unui articol trece prin mai multe etape de distilare,
decantare, clarificare. La fiecare etapa se intervine cu ceva
anume, ceva foarte precis. Cam care ar fi aceste etape?
The European Association of Science Editors (EASE)
Ghid EASE pentru autorii si traducatorii de articole stiintifice
in limba engleza (2017)
Acest set de indrumari editoriale concise si usor de citit a fost
publicat pentru prima data de Asociatia Europeana a Editorilor de
Publicatii Stiintifice (EASE) Ón 2010 si este actualizat anual.
Este disponibil gratuit in peste 20 de limbi
Documentul are scopul de a ajuta oamenii de stiinta din intreaga
lume sa-si prezinte in mod eficient rezultatele cercetarilor si sa-si
traduca corect lucrarile in limba engleza. Acest document explica
pe scurt cum se scriu lucrari complete, concise si clare si atrage
atentia asupra aspectelor etice: criterii privind drepturile de autor,
plagiatul, conflictul de interese etc. Setul contine opt anexe care
ofera exemple sau informatii mai detaliate privind subiectele
selectate (Abstracts, Ambiguity, Cohesion, Ethics, Plurals,
Simplicity, Spelling si Text-tables).
Utilizarea extinsa a EASE Guidelines este menita sa creasca
eficienta comunicarii stiintifice internationale.
Erorile clinice sunt o problema de sistem
BMJ editia in limba rom‚na
Acuzatiile de omucidere aduse cadrelor medicale in ultimii
cativa ani s-au axat pe erorile clinice individuale, nu pe
specialistii responsabili de luarea deciziilor referitoare la modul
in care sistemele sunt conduse ori finantate. Atunci cand putem
da vina pe cineva avem impresia ca am scapat de marul putred
din cos si ca acum e totul in regula. Este, insa, o eroare de
sistem. De fapt, cosul e problema.